22 Comments

I think if we can embrace the following two principles for critical/important decisions, we can make better decisions and move beyond reliance on experts and media that often present ideas as indisputable facts:

I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it is much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers that might be wrong. If we will only allow that, as we progress, we remain unsure, we will leave opportunities for alternatives. We will not become enthusiastic for the fact, the knowledge, the absolute truth of the day, but remain always uncertain … In order to make progress, one must leave the door to the unknown ajar. - Richard P. Feynman

And

The Royal Society's motto is "Nullius in verba," which means "Take nobody's word for it." This motto emphasizes the importance of empirical evidence and verification.

Adopting uncertainty and questioning accepted truths fosters critical thinking. This approach encourages us to challenge our sacred cows and pave the way for genuine progress. It also enables us to explore diverse perspectives and develop more robust solutions.

Expand full comment
author

I like both of those principles a lot. They are good reminders to keep ourselves open to new information.

Expand full comment

I think Albert Einstien (if he said this) was right, as I have reached the same conclusion:

“The more I learn, the more I realize how much I don't know.”

Or

A version from Aristotle:

"The more you know, the more you realize you don't know".

Expand full comment
author

100%. It's a view that I call "embracing my white belt."

https://www.polymathicbeing.com/p/embracing-my-white-belt

Expand full comment
Oct 13·edited Oct 13Liked by Michael Woudenberg

Moreso, I am going to skip butchering anything and walk away. To where? I'll use that collection of seeds I have gathered while looking at the cow and find the correct type of fertile ground in which to plant and tend them as they grow. Why? Because the cow is an herbivore and also must eat. Ahhh coffee, the dark of an Autumn morning, and philosophical metaphors. Lovely!

Expand full comment
Oct 13Liked by Michael Woudenberg

Great job in naming all the evil institutions that are protected by the even more evil government! Love your essays!

Expand full comment
author

Thanks!

Expand full comment
Oct 17Liked by Michael Woudenberg

As I've gotten older, I've eaten a lot less red meat. Sacred cow burgers are among my favorite foods for thought, as I'm sure you know!

You're right about not automatically dismantling a good system that has been in place, though. Sometimes those cows are serving some kind of useful purpose, but more often than not, you're way better off just unshackling and untethering yourself from those views. As a child, I didn't really know how to eat these burgers, but then I got my fill from around age 17 through like 33 or 34, maybe. That was A LOT for me.

Since then, I've been steadily trying to find the right balance, and I've finally begun to understand that I don't have to tear it all down myself.

Expand full comment
author

Great points and totally agree. I've always been a bit more conservative than 'burn it all down.' but sometimes we need to understand what to burn down and how to build a pitchfork and torch wielding mass and do it together. 😆

Expand full comment

I was born with a heavy respect for institutions, for what it's worth, and was only able to modify my view through drastic measures: becoming a punk.

It worked, and I am grateful for that.

Expand full comment
author

I was born with my middle finger up. 🤣👊🏼

Expand full comment
Oct 13Liked by Michael Woudenberg

The approach I try to take, though not always well, is to try and figure out why I have an opinion on a specific topic. Is this based on a few headlines I’ve read, or is it because of personal experience or research I have done? Sometimes the opinion can feel like a strong conviction from either origination, but if I realize the opinion is based on just what someone else said, I probably am more willing to consider a different view.

Expand full comment
author

I 100% agree and I like how you specify 'though not always well' because I feel the same way too. I just ran into that the other day where I realized I was doing something I know to not work the way I'd want. It's so easy to fall into the 'easy' path.

Expand full comment
Oct 13Liked by Michael Woudenberg

The 'easy' path is definitely more comfortable, so it takes getting used to being uncomfortable sometimes!

Expand full comment
Oct 13Liked by Michael Woudenberg

I am convinced that it is necessary to kill some sacred cows. But one of them is to believe that all of them deserve to die. Chesterton saw this very well: Don't ever take a fence down until you know the reason why it was put up.

Expand full comment
author

Exactly. I Iove Chesterton's Fence. I talk about this regarding traditions being solutions to problems we've forgotten:

https://www.polymathicbeing.com/p/tradition

Expand full comment
Oct 13Liked by Michael Woudenberg

So many sacred cows out there!

Expand full comment
author

Yes there are.

Expand full comment
RemovedOct 13Liked by Michael Woudenberg
Comment removed
Expand full comment
author

The consequence of monocrop farming to produce that many plant calories would dwarf anything cows or chickens produce. Plus the long term health problems with vegan are legion.

Expand full comment
Oct 13Liked by Michael Woudenberg

That is quite a bit of misinformation. It is a sacred cow to many people. Anti vegan misinformation. The balance lies in the middle somewhere. I held this very same Sacred Cow myself, once upon a time.

Expand full comment
author

Exactly!

Expand full comment
Oct 13·edited Oct 13Liked by Michael Woudenberg

I went vegetarian some time ago. It was helpful for my health, my bank account, and the planet all at once. Myco proteins are my own personal jam. If you ever see a product called Meati, grab a package and cook as directed. If you didn't KNOW it wasn't chicken or steak, you wouldn't know. Small ingredient list that doesn't include major allergens. The topic really is a Sacred Cow topic. One that most folk (including me until I decided to refuse to let it be one) will bias themselves backward over. Much like a persons religious views or lack thereof. It is so easy to do. There is so much passionate science that is actually media influence on both "sides" of the issue.

Expand full comment